The High Court in Uganda has confirmed the validity of Emmanuel Rwashande’s nomination as a parliamentary candidate for Lwemiyaga Constituency, dismissing a late appeal brought by the sitting MP, Theodore Ssekikubo.
In a decision handed down on Tuesday, Justice Joyce Kavuma ruled that the challenge was submitted beyond the required five-day window for contesting Electoral Commission determinations.
She made it clear that judicial bodies lack the power to extend this statutory period, regardless of any claims involving delays in notification.
“Election-related proceedings demand strict punctuality, and the deadlines established by legislation are non-negotiable,” Justice Kavuma stated, underscoring the critical importance of adhering to prescribed timelines in such matters.
Both Ssekikubo and Rwashande had previously been approved by the Electoral Commission to run for the Lwemiyaga parliamentary seat in Sembabule District in the upcoming January 15, 2026, general elections.
Ssekikubo obtained copies of Rwashande’s nomination documents and lodged a complaint with the Commission, alleging non-compliance with legal standards.
On December 3, 2025, the Commission rejected the complaint. Ssekikubo then approached the High Court with an appeal, seeking condonation for the late filing on grounds that the Commission had been slow to formally communicate its outcome.
The judge dismissed this plea, pointing out that court records confirmed the decision was delivered to Ssekikubo’s legal representatives on the very date it was issued—triggering the five-day appeal period right away.
“Parliamentary deadlines cannot be waived by the courts, no matter the perceived justification put forward by a candidate,” Justice Kavuma emphasized.
As a result, the High Court invalidated Ssekikubo’s appeal and denied his request for an extension, allowing Rwashande to stay on the ballot paper.
In a further order, the court stipulated that each side should cover its own legal expenses, recognizing the broader public significance of electoral litigation and the importance of not discouraging future challenges through cost penalties.
This judgment highlights Uganda’s firm stance on enforcing election deadlines rigorously, particularly with the January 15 general elections now drawing near.

